Here is the summary of Meta Platforms, Inc.’s Form 10-Q for the third quarter ended September 30, 2025:
Financial Performance
Meta’s total revenue reached 51.24billion in the third quarter of 2025, a 26% increase compared to the same period in 2024. However, net income dropped significantly to 2.71billion, far below the 15.69billion recorded last year, with diluted earnings per share falling from 6.03 to 1.05. This decline was primarily due to the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA) legislation, which resulted in a one-time income tax expense of 15.93billion, pushing the effective tax rate for the quarter to 87%. Despite the tax impact on net income, income from operations grew 18% to 205.4billion, indicating that core business profitability remains strong.
Operational Metrics and Advertising
User engagement continued to grow, with Family Daily Active People (DAP) averaging 3.54billion in September 2025, an 8% increase year-over-year. Advertising revenue was the primary driver of growth, rising 26% year-over-year. This was attributed to a 14% increase in the number of ad impressions delivered and a 10% increase in the average price per ad. Growth in ad impressions was particularly notable in the Asia-Pacific region, driven by increased user activity and engagement.
Segment Performance
- Family of Apps: Revenue was 50.77billion, up 26% year-over-year, with an operating income of 24.97billion.
- Reality Labs: Revenue grew by 74% to 470million, primarily driven by sales of Meta Quest and AI glasses. However, the segment remains in a loss position, reporting an operating loss of 4.43billion for the quarter. Meta expects Reality Labs’ operating losses to continue increasing in 2025 as the company persists in investing in Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), and the development of the broader ecosystem.
Investment and Strategic Focus
Meta continues to focus on investments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and infrastructure. Research and development expenses surged 35% to 15.14billion, mainly to support personnel compensation for AI initiatives and infrastructure costs. Additionally, in October 2025, Meta formed a joint venture with Blue Owl Capital to develop a data center in Louisiana and has committed significant capital to cloud computing capacity.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
The company faces several major legal challenges:
- Antitrust and Competition: The trial for the FTC’s antitrust lawsuit regarding the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp concluded in May 2025, and the company is currently awaiting the court’s verdict.
- EU Regulations: The European Commission found that Meta’s “subscription for no ads” model does not comply with the Digital Markets Act (DMA). This may force Meta to adjust its advertising model in Europe, potentially impacting future revenue.
- Tax Disputes: The company is involved in significant tax litigation with the IRS involving tens of billions of dollars in potential back taxes, covering issues such as transfer pricing and R&D credits.
Below is the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for Meta Platforms, Inc. for the third quarter ended September 30, 2025, including a Year-over-Year (YoY) comparison with 2024.
Meta Platforms, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(In millions, except per share amounts)
| Item | 2025 Q3 (in millions) | 2024 Q3 (in millions) | YoY % |
| Revenue | $ 51,242 | $ 40,589 | +26.2% |
| Costs and expenses: | |||
| Cost of revenue | 9,206 | 7,375 | +24.8% |
| Research and development | 15,144 | 11,177 | +35.5% |
| Marketing and sales | 2,845 | 2,822 | +0.8% |
| General and administrative | 3,512 | 1,865 | +88.3% |
| Total costs and expenses | 30,707 | 23,239 | +32.1% |
| Income from operations | 20,535 | 17,350 | +18.4% |
| Interest and other income, net | 1,128 | 472 | +139.0% |
| Income before provision for income taxes | 21,663 | 17,822 | +21.6% |
| Provision for income taxes | 18,954 | 2,134 | +788.1% |
| Net income | $ 2,709 | $ 15,688 | -82.7% |
| Earnings per share: | |||
| Basic | $1.08 | $ 6.20 | -82.6% |
| Diluted | $1.05 | $ 6.03 | -82.6% |
Key Financial Analysis
- Strong Revenue Growth (+26%):Growth was primarily driven by advertising revenue. The number of ad impressions delivered increased by 14%, while the average price per ad rose by 10%.
- Significant Increase in R&D (+35%):Research and development expenses climbed to 15.14billion. This was largely due to increased employee compensation (including share-based compensation) and infrastructure costs associated with supporting Artificial Intelligence (AI) initiatives.
- Surge in General and Administrative Expenses (+88%):G&A expenses jumped from 1.865billion to 3.512billion, mainly due to higher legal-related costs.
- Net Income Hit by Massive Tax Charge (-83%):Despite an 18.4% increase in operating income, net income plummeted from 15.69billion last year to 2.71billion. This drastic drop was entirely due to the provision for income taxes skyrocketing to 18.95billion (up from 2.13billion). This was caused by the enactment of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act” (OBBBA), which required the company to recognize a one-time tax charge of 15.93billion, resulting in an effective tax rate of 87% for the quarter.
This summary presents the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for Meta Platforms, Inc. as of September 30, 2025, compared with the fiscal year-end data from December 31, 2024.
Meta Platforms, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions)
| Item | Sept 30, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Change ($) | Change (%) |
| Assets | ||||
| Current assets: | ||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $10,187 | $ 43,889 | $ (33,702) | -76.8% |
| Marketable securities | 34,261 | 33,926 | 335 | +1.0% |
| Accounts receivable, net | 17,297 | 16,994 | 303 | +1.8% |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 11,373 | 5,236 | 6,137 | +117.2% |
| Total current assets | 73,118 | 100,045 | (26,927) | -26.9% |
| Non-current assets: | ||||
| Non-marketable equity investments | 25,074 | 6,070 | 19,004 | +313.1% |
| Property and equipment, net | 160,270 | 121,346 | 38,924 | +32.1% |
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | 17,372 | 14,922 | 2,450 | +16.4% |
| Goodwill | 21,158 | 20,654 | 504 | +2.4% |
| Other assets | 6,852 | 13,017 | (6,165) | -47.4% |
| Total assets | $ 303,844 | $ 276,054 | 27,790 | +10.1% |
| Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||
| Current liabilities: | ||||
| Accounts payable | $7,798 | $ 7,687 | 111 | +1.4% |
| Operating lease liabilities, current | 2,113 | 1,942 | 171 | +8.8% |
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 27,047 | 23,967 | 3,080 | +12.9% |
| Total current liabilities | 36,958 | 33,596 | 3,362 | +10.0% |
| Non-current liabilities: | ||||
| Operating lease liabilities, non-current | 20,113 | 18,292 | 1,821 | +10.0% |
| Long-term debt | 28,834 | 28,826 | 8 | +0.0% |
| Long-term income taxes | 11,738 | 9,987 | 1,751 | +17.5% |
| Other liabilities | 12,135 | 2,716 | 9,419 | +346.8% |
| Total liabilities | 109,778 | 93,417 | 16,361 | +17.5% |
| Stockholders’ equity: | ||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 92,330 | 83,228 | 9,102 | +10.9% |
| Accumulated other comprehensive income/loss | 159 | (3,097) | 3,256 | N/A |
| Retained earnings | 101,577 | 102,506 | (929) | -0.9% |
| Total stockholders’ equity | 194,066 | 182,637 | 11,429 | +6.3% |
| Total liabilities and equity | $ 303,844 | $ 276,054 | 27,790 | +10.1% |
Key Financial Position Analysis
- Significant Cash Reduction (-77%):Cash and cash equivalents dropped from 43.9billion at the end of 2024 to 10.2billion. This was primarily driven by massive capital expenditures (48.3billion), share repurchases (26.3billion), dividend payments (4billion), and tax payments related to the settlement of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) (14.1billion), which collectively offset operational cash flows.
- Surge in Infrastructure Investment (Property and Equipment +32%):Net property and equipment increased by nearly 39billion, reaching 160.3billion. This reflects Meta’s ongoing and massive investment in servers, data centers, and network infrastructure to support its AI initiatives.
- Explosive Growth in Non-Marketable Equity Investments (+313%):This item rose from 6.07billion to 25.07billion, largely due to a 13.79billion investment in Scale AI made in June 2025.
- Notable Increase in Other Liabilities (+347%):Other liabilities surged from 2.7billion to 12.1billion. While the report does not provide an exhaustive line-item breakdown for every cent, such increases typically involve long-term accruals or provisions related to legal and tax matters.
- Increase in Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets (+117%):This category grew by approximately 6.1billion, which includes 4.66billion classified as “held-for-sale assets” as of September 30, 2025. These assets were primarily related to data center construction and land, which were subsequently contributed to the joint venture with Blue Owl in October 2025.
Overview of OBBBA
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) is a piece of U.S. income tax legislation enacted on July 4, 2025. While it provides certain long-term tax benefits, its implementation triggered immediate and substantial accounting charges for Meta Platforms, Inc.
1. Key Tax Incentives
OBBBA introduced several provisions designed to reduce the cash tax burden for corporations:
- Immediate Expensing: Starting in 2025, companies are allowed to immediately expense domestic Research and Development (R&D) costs and certain capital expenditures, rather than amortizing them over several years.
- Enhanced Deductions: Beginning in 2026, the act will provide enhanced deductions for Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII).
These provisions are expected to lower Meta’s U.S. federal cash tax payments for the remainder of 2025 and in future years.
2. Constraints and Accounting Impact: Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (CAMT)
Although OBBBA offers incentives, these benefits are limited by a 15% Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (CAMT). This led to significant accounting adjustments for Meta:
- Valuation Allowance on Deferred Tax Assets: Due to the implementation of CAMT, Meta determined that certain deferred tax assets (assets originally expected to offset future taxes) might not be realizable. Consequently, the company had to recognize a valuation allowance against these assets.
- Impact on Share-Based Compensation: Under the influence of CAMT, excess tax benefits from share-based compensation are also considered less likely to be realized.
3. Specific Financial Impact on Meta’s 2025 Q3 Results
The enactment of OBBBA resulted in a massive one-time charge for Meta during the third quarter:
- One-Time Income Tax Expense: Meta recognized a discrete tax charge of 15.93billion in Q3 2025.
- Surge in Effective Tax Rate: This charge caused Meta’s effective tax rate for the quarter to skyrocket to 87%, compared to just 12% in the same period last year.
- Impact on Net Income: This tax hit was the primary reason Meta’s net income plummeted to 2.71billion this quarter, down from 15.69billion in the prior year’s third quarter.
In October 2025, Meta entered into a joint venture (JV) agreement with affiliates of funds managed by Blue Owl Capital, Inc. to develop a new data center campus located in Richland Parish, Louisiana.
Capital Contribution and Ownership Structure
The transaction involves a significant transfer of assets and capital, establishing Blue Owl as the primary financier:
- Blue Owl (Investor): Contributed 7billion in cash to the joint venture and holds an 80% equity interest.
- Meta: Contributed assets valued at 4.3billion (net of liabilities), primarily consisting of “Construction in Progress” and land. Upon closing, Meta retained a 20% equity interest and received a one-time cash distribution of 2.6billion from the joint venture.
Operational and Leaseback Arrangement
While Meta holds a minority stake, it remains deeply involved in the development and will be the primary occupant of the facility:
- Management Services: Meta will provide construction management, administrative, and property management services to the joint venture.
- Lease Commitments: Meta signed several operating lease agreements to rent the campus properties. Leases are expected to commence in 2029 with an initial term of 4 years. The total committed lease payments are approximately 12.3billion. Meta holds options to renew the leases for a total duration of up to 20 years.
- Residual Value Guarantee: Meta provided a residual value guarantee for the first 16 years of operations. If the value of the data center falls below a specified threshold (starting at 28billion) upon lease termination or non-renewal, Meta is required to pay the difference.
Accounting Treatment
Because Meta does not control the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s economic performance, the JV is classified as an “Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entity.” Consequently, Meta records its interest as a non-marketable equity investment under the equity method of accounting and does not consolidate the joint venture’s balance sheet into its own.
Based on Meta Platforms, Inc.’s Q3 2025 Form 10-Q filing, the Digital Markets Act (DMA) has exerted specific and severe regulatory pressure and financial impact on Meta’s European operations.
1. Core Controversy: “Subscription for No Ads” Model
The DMA is designed to regulate the behavior of large digital platforms, referred to as “gatekeepers.” The primary point of conflict between Meta and EU regulators centers on the “Subscription for No Ads” model Meta introduced to comply with privacy regulations.
- Investigation Background: The European Commission launched an investigation in March 2024 to evaluate whether Meta’s consent model complied with Article 5(2) of the DMA. This article restricts gatekeepers from combining personal data from core platform services with data from other services without valid user consent.
- Ruling and Penalty: In April 2025, the Commission issued a final decision finding that Meta’s model did not meet DMA requirements. Consequently, Meta was fined 200million.
2. Meta’s Response and Appeals
In response to the ruling, Meta has taken both legal action and initiated product adjustments:
- Filing an Appeal: Meta filed an appeal against the European Commission’s decision on July 4, 2025.
- Alternative Options (LPA): Based on feedback from the Commission, Meta introduced the “Less Personalized Ads (LPA)” option in November 2024. Following the final decision by the Commission, Meta made significant modifications to the LPA model in an attempt to satisfy compliance requirements.
3. Impact on Business and Finances
The DMA poses ongoing risks to Meta’s operations:
- Advertising Revenue Risks: The DMA limits Meta’s ability to use data signals for ad targeting and measurement. The company warned that if forced to further modify its model or face additional fines during the appeal process, it could lead to a significant deterioration of the user experience in Europe. This could have a major negative impact on Meta’s European business and revenue, with effects potentially appearing as early as Q4 2025.
- Increased Compliance Costs: Since the key requirements of the DMA took effect for designated gatekeepers in March 2024, Meta has had to invest substantial resources into compliance, thereby increasing operating costs.
- Operational Restrictions: Beyond restricting data combination, the DMA imposes constraints and requirements on Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) and product design.
Based on Meta Platforms, Inc.’s Q3 2025 Form 10-Q filing, the company is facing a series of significant tax disputes and litigations with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The core issue centers on transfer pricing, specifically the valuation of intellectual property (IP) transferred to foreign subsidiaries.
1. 2010 Tax Year Litigation (Facebook, Inc. v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue)
This is the earliest and most indicative case, involving how Meta valued assets transferred to its international subsidiaries.
- Background: In 2016, the IRS issued a Statutory Notice of Deficiency for Meta’s 2010 tax year, challenging its transfer pricing arrangements. Meta subsequently filed a petition with the Tax Court.
- Latest Ruling: On May 22, 2025, the Tax Court issued its opinion, determining the value of the IP Meta transferred to its international subsidiary to be 7.79billion. This valuation is 1.48billion higher than the amount originally reported by Meta.
- Financial Impact: Based on this revised valuation, Meta re-estimated the net tax impact and increased its income tax expense due to the remeasurement of unrecognized tax benefits.
- Next Steps: The Tax Court will review tax computations submitted by both parties before making a final decision. Once the decision is final, both Meta and the IRS have the option to appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
2. 2011–2013 Tax Year Litigation
- Background: In 2018, the IRS issued a second notice of deficiency covering the 2011 through 2013 tax years.
- Details: The IRS applied its positions from the 2010 case to these years and proposed new adjustments related to other transfer pricing transactions and tax credits.
- Status: Meta disagrees with the IRS’s position and has filed a petition with the Tax Court to challenge the adjustments.
3. 2017–2019 Tax Year Dispute (Recent and Large-Scale)
This represents a major new development that emerged during the third quarter of 2025.
- Notice Content: In September 2025, Meta received a notice of deficiency from the IRS for the 2017 through 2019 tax years.
- Claim Amount: The IRS asserts that Meta owes an additional 15.89billion in taxes, plus interest and penalties.
- Core Controversy: The largest dispute in this notice involves the same underlying transfer pricing transactions identified in the 2010 case (i.e., the ongoing impact of that specific IP transfer).
- Meta’s Position: Meta strongly disagrees with the IRS’s position, noting that the IRS’s proposal does not reflect appropriate offsets, such as the mandatory transition tax, Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) tax, and Foreign-Derived Intangible Income (FDII) deductions. Meta is currently evaluating its options to challenge this notice.
Overall Risk Profile
As of September 30, 2025, Meta’s total unrecognized tax benefits amounted to 16.98billion. This total primarily stems from uncertainties related to transfer pricing with foreign subsidiaries (including IP licensing and service provision) as well as research and development tax credits.
According to Meta Platforms, Inc.’s Q3 2025 financial reports and related industry developments, Meta made a massive strategic investment in Scale AI, totaling approximately $14.3 billion for a 49% stake. This transaction values Scale AI at roughly $29 billion.
The core reasons behind Meta’s massive investment in Scale AI include:
1. Securing High-Quality Data Supply
Data is the “fuel” for Artificial Intelligence. As Meta develops advanced models like Llama 4 and beyond, the demand for high-quality, accurately labeled data has become critical.
- Industry Leader: Scale AI is the world’s premier provider of data labeling and model evaluation services.
- Strategic Control: By owning nearly half of Scale AI, Meta ensures a stable and privileged supply chain for the human-labeled data required to fine-tune its AI models, preventing competitors from bottlenecking its data access.
2. Strategic “Acqui-hire” of Alexandr Wang
The deal is widely viewed as a talent acquisition on a massive scale.
- New Leadership: Scale AI’s founder and CEO, Alexandr Wang, has joined Meta to lead the newly formed “Superintelligence” (or Meta Superintelligence Labs) division.
- AGI Ambitions: Mark Zuckerberg specifically sought Wang’s business acumen and vision—often compared to that of OpenAI’s Sam Altman—to revitalize Meta’s AI roadmap and push toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI).
3. Disrupting the AI Ecosystem
Scale AI was previously a neutral infrastructure provider for nearly all major AI labs, including OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Tesla.
- Neutrality Shift: Meta’s dominant stake has disrupted this neutrality. Reports indicate that rivals like OpenAI have already begun reducing their dependency on Scale AI due to concerns over data confidentiality.
- Competitive Edge: This move forces competitors to find alternative data labeling solutions, potentially slowing their development cycles while Meta gains insight into the data priorities of the entire industry.
4. Bypassing Cloud Monopolies
By investing in the “data layer” of the AI stack, Meta is diversifying its strategy away from just competing on compute power or cloud infrastructure.
- The Data Advantage: While Microsoft and Google have massive cloud advantages, Meta is betting that owning the invisible infrastructure of intelligence—the curated data—will be the ultimate differentiator in the race for superintelligence.
Summary of the Investment
| Feature | Details |
| Investment Amount | Approximately $14.3 billion |
| Ownership Stake | 49% |
| Executive Move | Alexandr Wang joins Meta to lead Superintelligence efforts |
| Previous Valuation | $13.8 billion (May 2024) |
| Current Valuation | Over $29 billion |
Sources: